Der National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (Abkürzung NPVIC oder NaPoVoInterCo) ist ein Abkommen zwischen verschiedenen US-Bundesstaaten in. Als Popular Vote wird in den Vereinigten Staaten die Anzahl der abgegebenen Stimmen bzw. der prozentuale Stimmenanteil bei einer Wahl für ein politisches Mandat bezeichnet. Seien Sie der erste, der dieses Produkt bewertet. Endpreis CHF Normaler Preis CHF inkl. MwSt. Farbe OPI by Popular Vote. Grösse.
National Popular Vote Interstate CompactDer National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (Abkürzung NPVIC oder NaPoVoInterCo) ist ein Abkommen zwischen verschiedenen US-Bundesstaaten in. Beispiele von popular vote in einem Satz, wie man sie benutzt. 20 Beispiel: General elections were decided by a simple popular vote, not by the county-unit. Seien Sie der erste, der dieses Produkt bewertet. Endpreis CHF Normaler Preis CHF inkl. MwSt. Farbe OPI by Popular Vote. Grösse.
Popular Vote User account menu VideoThe Popular Vote vs. the Electoral College Als Popular Vote wird in den Vereinigten Staaten die Anzahl der abgegebenen Stimmen bzw. der prozentuale Stimmenanteil bei einer Wahl für ein politisches Mandat bezeichnet. Als Popular Vote wird in den Vereinigten Staaten die Anzahl der abgegebenen Stimmen bzw. der prozentuale Stimmenanteil bei einer Wahl für ein politisches. Der National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (Abkürzung NPVIC oder NaPoVoInterCo) ist ein Abkommen zwischen verschiedenen US-Bundesstaaten in. Übersetzung im Kontext von „the popular vote“ in Englisch-Deutsch von Reverso Context: And the government has won three consecutive general elections.
Related popular vote crossword solver. Latest Update Crossword Clue. Begin drawing lots of scribbles Geek Uncontrolled fit Small oared boat Grander Test uses an exceptional intellectual ability Makes more orderly Discounted false assumptions Bath coats Outdoor drying frame Deep chasm Leftover piece Trapped Volatile tradesmen to protest in rally Crispbread grain.
Hayes, Rutherford Hayes. Tilden, Samuel Tilden. Garfield, James Garfield. Hancock, Winfield Scott Hancock.
Cleveland, Grover Cleveland. Blaine, James Blaine. Harrison, Benjamin Harrison. McKinley, William McKinley. Bryan, William Jennings Bryan.
Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt. Parker, Alton Brooks Parker. Taft, William Taft. Wilson, Woodrow Wilson. Hughes, Charles Evans Hughes.
Harding, Warren Harding. Cox, James Cox. Coolidge, Calvin Coolidge. Davis, John Davis. Hoover, Herbert Hoover. Smith, Al Smith.
Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt. Landon, Alf Landon. Willkie, Wendell Willkie. Dewey, Thomas Dewey. Truman, Harry Truman. Eisenhower, Dwight Eisenhower.
Stevenson, Adlai Stevenson. Kennedy, John F. Nixon, Richard Nixon. Johnson, Lyndon Johnson. Goldwater, Barry Goldwater. That is, more Americans voted for the candidate but he or she still lost.
While this is rare, it has happened 4 times:. A Gallup poll in January found that a vast majority of Americans would prefer to do away with the electoral college for presidential elections.
It would be wrong to assume that Hillary Clinton or Al Gore would have been president had the electoral college been abolished and elections were to be decided by popular vote.
Indeed, Donald Trump has said he supports a popular vote election for president, and has reiterated this view even after winning the electoral college vote and losing the popular vote.
As Aaron Blake argued when he wrote for the Washington Post , the electoral college forces candidates to structure their campaign in a specific way; they focus on about a dozen "purple" or swing states — such as Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Virginia, Iowa and New Hampshire.
Republicans waste no resources campaigning in decidedly blue states like Washington, Oregon and California, while Democrats avoid campaigning in red states like Texas, Georgia and Oklahoma.
If elections were decided by popular vote, campaign strategies would be very different. If Trump had campaigned more effectively in California, for example, his popular vote deficit in that state would possibly not have been as large as it was.
Clinton got 4. In other words, if the state of California were excluded, Trump would win the popular vote by 1.
Supporters of the electoral college system say that this was exactly the kind of scenario—i. As things stand now, the practical effect of the electoral college is that Republicans have an advantage over Democrats.
Running an analysis of the electoral system , complete with simulations for various voting outcomes, the Economist magazine found that.
The bias results from current political trends; when the system was designed over years ago the situation was quite different.
Every state gets only two senators, no matter how populous. The populous states happen to have large urban populations that tend to be more Democratic-leaning.
So in the political atmosphere that we find ourselves in today, Democrats are at a disadvantage. Another years from now, the situation may well be reversed.
Share this comparison:. If you read this far, you should follow us:. Diffen LLC, n. Electoral Vote vs. Popular Vote. Delegates convene and vote.
Winner of that vote is elected for the position in question. If the election is based off a popular vote, each of these areas would need to be closely examined in real-time, which would enhance the security of each vote that is cast.
There would be fewer opportunities to illegally alter the results of an election. Battleground states would disappear in U. Under the current structure of the electoral college, the focus of a presidential campaign is on the so-called battleground states.
These are the states that may go to either major party candidate in the election. That means some voters, like Republicans in California or Democrats in Mississippi, are voting without power and without attention from their preferred candidates each year.
A switch to the popular vote would eliminate the concept of a battleground state because the issue would be more on issues than states.
It would eliminate the Congressional provisions for a non-majority election. The electoral requires that an election which does not receive a majority of electoral votes be taken into the U.
House of Representatives. At that stage, anyone who received an electoral vote is eligible to become the next president. Should that happen, then the final decision of who gets to serve as President of the United States is taken away from individual voters.
It happened once, in Moving to the popular vote structure would eliminate this potential issue. It could help to reduce partisanship.
Under the current structure of presidential elections in the U. This divide creates natural divisions between groups of people who both support their country, but in different ways.
It would eliminate superfluous votes. Under the electoral college system and other voting systems not based on popular voting , it only takes one extra vote more than the other candidate to create the needed results for the election.
All other votes cast for that candidate are therefore superfluous. In , Hillary Clinton had more than 10 million of these votes, while Donald Trump had more than 8.
The popular vote eliminates this issue too. A close election would trigger the need for a full recount.
The cost of a presidential election in the United States is already several billion dollars.2/1/ · Definition of a Popular Vote A popular vote works just like it sounds. A group of people vote on an issue or candidate. The votes are then tallied, and the issues or candidates are annhuybens.com Duration: 3 min. 12/7/ · popular vote in British English. (ˈpɒpjʊlə vəʊt) noun. 1. politics. the vote of all a country's or constituency's voters, as opposed to that of a particular group such as an electoral college, or parliament. an amendment allowing for the election of the state president by . The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia (Explanation). It has been enacted into law by 15 states and DC with electoral votes (Map of states). It .